Showing posts with label Broadband. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Broadband. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Community Broadband



If you talk to the phone or cable company Community Broadband -- a city or town that operates their own internet and telephone services-- is an evil word. In the land of the free and the home of the brave, you would think public competition would be welcomed but sadly this is not the case.  Around the USA and the world, Community Broadband is becoming a big issue.

In many communities around the United States, limited internet access or low internet speeds has forced them to look at running their own fiber optics networks. They can provide internet and phone services just like any other city run services like water and garbage, it’s a standard utility. In most cases the incumbent Telecom -- AT&T or Verizon and the cable company -- Comcast or Time Warner have not welcomed the competition.





During the Bush years the FCC and the federal government backed a internet duopoly -- 2 company monopoly. In a blog post, Dan Jaspers said "This concreted our unique US duopoly: cable versus Telco, the two broadband choices that most Americans have today. In exchange for a truly competitive market, the US received promises of widespread deployment. And, to some degree this has worked. Unfettered by significant competition or price pressure, broadband in at least its most basic form can now be delivered to most homes in America, albeit at a comparatively high cost to the consumer."

This is in part why we have dropped to 15th place for highest internet price and lowest speeds worldwide. Most places in the US get the internet, but when compared to Europe and Asia we lag behind. "In Asia and Europe, Gigabit services are becoming common, and the price paid by consumers per megabit is a tiny fraction of what we pay here at home." Dan Jasper.

This is what happened in Lafayette, LA. The city residents wanted to get better internet speeds but Cox Cable and AT&T said that their community was too small. They said that upgrades to their networks would happen in other places in the state first, and it would be years before they would get around to Lafayette.


So the city passed a bond and told the Lafayette City Power and Water Department to run fiber to all residents. In fact Lafayette City Power and Water Department was started more than 70 years ago because big power and water companies told the city that they were too small to bother with. The city would provide internet at speeds 10 times that of the cable company, telephone and TV services for a faction of the cost. Soon after, the Cox cable and AT&T fought back.

They sued the city to block the building of the network on the grounds that it was unfair for them to compete with a government provider.  Then they went to the state government to try to pass laws that would prohibit any city from providing phone or internet services in the whole state. This is not a new strategy. Telcos in more than 10 different states have tried to make it illegal for communities to run their own networks.

After 3 years of legal battles and a smear campaign, the networks started to be built last year. To no one’s surprise residents flocked to the new network from AT&T and Cox cable. To counter this AT&T and Cox cable there were forced to upgrade their networks and drop their prices.

Community Broadband is not new, here in the Bay Area San Bruno has operated its own cable company since the late ‘80s.  The city residents passed a bond to fund the building of the cable network after the large cable companies passed on building in the city or proposed high monthly fee to provide services. San Bruno Cable operates at a profit to the city budget and pays for all system upgrades.  They have expanded their services from just TV cable to now include internet and phone services.

In Europe they have a different view of Community Broadband. Back in 2008, the European Union ruled that a city's involvement in Community Broadband projects were legal, and that it did not interfere in the broadband market. Herman Wagter over at arstechnica.com has a great article on how Amsterdam is rolling out fiber to the whole city. 

"The city of Amsterdam has been involved for several years in building Citynet, a partnership between the city and two private investors to wire 40,000 Amsterdam buildings with fiber. And it's not just fiber, it's open access fiber—any ISP can sign up to use the infrastructure and deliver ultra-fast Internet access."

In Amsterdam the city runs fiber but doesn’t provide consumer services.  The network is open access-- any company may rent space to provide services to consumers. This has led to a very competitive market with a half dozen companies for resident to choose from.  Another side affect is the prices have been steadily following. In a city with highly packed apartments, small streets, canals and house boats—all these places need fiber run to them.


For more click on the video.




Thursday, September 15, 2011

Top Controversies


At&t T-mobile Merger
The deal proposed by AT&T will make the largest cell phone company in the US. They will effectively become the only nation-wide GSM cell phone company in the US. The US government has sued to stop this. In my opinion it will give consumers less choose and hurt competition.

Net Neutrality
The idea that stresses no restrictions by ISP -- Internet service providers or governments on consumers access to networks that participate in the internet.  Network neutrality would prevent restrictions on content, sites, or devices. Telecom companies want to impose a tiered model in order to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and force subscribers to buy their services over others. I believe net neutrality to be very important to preserve our current internet freedom.

Community Broadband
 Is the attempt by grassroots groups or municipal agencies to to provide viable alternative to traditional ISPs.
Community Broadband can include wireless internet, phone, TV service and Internet. many states have passed or consider law barring local government from providing Broadband services to their residents. I belive that Broadband is becoming as important as electrical power or water. Local community should be able to decide if they want to statrt  community broadband to compete against private companies.

Gps and lightsquared
 LightSquared is a ground-based and satellite based next-generation 4G network  The network is currently opposed by Save Our GPS Coalition, an industry-standard group that promotes GPS issues in Congress. They say that if the network were to be deployed as currently planned it would have severe affects on GPS.  That it would put consumers at risk of losing GPS signal in North America.

ISP Affiliate Program 
ISP used a method of generating additional cash through advertising based on mistyped URLs in a web browesr.The results was searches of certain well-known brands by users where not being provided by the intended search engine. Instead they were being provided through affiliate marketing networks to earn revenue for the ISP. This all was done without consumer knowledge.